The
original report`s layout have been
preserved as much as possible - i.e. the inaccurate reference to the
manufacturer as 'Messerschmidt'.
Some French expressions, and names of
organisation and ranks were also kept for the sake of easier reference without
hindered by clumsy attempts to translate them into English. The
author begs the dear Reader to overlook the possible errors and
welcomes any and all corrections and suggestions, especially concerning
spelling or translation mistakes. Email at kurfurst@atw.hu.
Special thanks
must be expressed to Romain R. for his translation.
Proof-reading, editing and hosting by Kurfürst.
Tactical
trials against French fighters were performed later on with the same
plane; see HERE.
Attached Graph in the Rapport.
Climb (calculated from climb times). Manifold pressure in level flight
and Speed in level flight.
CHAPTER I
REVIEW
------
12/ 6/39 - Aircraft
arrival at the Center.
7 to 12 December 1939 -
Reassembly, equipping and identification.
12/13/39 -
Undercarriage rolling test.
12/14/39 - Tanks
emptying and filling with: ( 'C' fuel of 92 octane.
( Intava Oil
100.
( Cooling mixture
ethane-diol 50% by following
( the S.T.R.S
informations
( by replacing original
components).
12/15/39 - Engine
measurement on test bench.
12/16/39 - Finishing
the aicraft setup - roundels painting.
12/18/39 - Instruments
inspection by the Center`s pilot.
12/19/39 - Equipment
verified during flight. 12/20/39 -
(flight interrupted due to fog)
12/21/39 - Radios
tuned on ground.
12/22/39 - Engine
inspection.
12/22/39 - Level
flights from 2000 to 7000 (two flights)
Searching for optimal climb
angle.
12/23/39 - Climbing at
8000m,
Fuel consummation test flight.
Thus 7
flights, 5 hours of duration in total.
...........
CHAPTER II
PERFORMANCES
------------
The performances have been achieved in a "day combat
flight"
setup, this means a weight of 2540kg (centering undertermined).
Level flight and climbing conditions "match
together" under
the
rated altitude at a 1100 HP power and 2400
rpm.(permissable power for
five minutes). Above this altitude at
full throttle, with propeller pitch giving
2400rpm.
The climb has been interrupted at
8.300 m. due to malfunctioning of the engine.
2°- Level Flight Speed -
Testing
on 12/28/39 -
Two level flight series have been
executed :
- One from 2.500 m. to 5.500 m. with radiators open due to high
coolant liquid
and oil temperatures.
- The second one from 5000 to 7000m, with
radiators closed.
...........
<>
- 4 -
The
results of tests are shown in joined graphs and in the board below:
1° serie - Radiators Open -
Altitude
Level
Speed
R.P.M.
Manifold
pressure
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
490 km/h
500
512
520
530
520
512
2400 /min
"
"
"
"
"
"
960
mm.
"
"
"
920
870
840
2° serie -
Closed Radiators -
Altitude
Level
Speed
R.P.M.
Manifold
pressure
5000
5500
6000
6500
7000
570 km/h.
570
565
560
545
2400 /min
"
"
"
"
880
mm.
850
800
750
700
Given the fact that the plane
hasn't still done 'a base', the tests
have been
denuded by assuming that the
antenna coefficient was equal at
0,1.
Due to that, there is an
uncertainity about the results. This
uncertainty
is about
2 to 3%. Thus maximum speed is
570km/h +/-15km/h.
3° - Controls -
Testing on 12/23/39:
------------------
The test consisted of a 50' flight (including a 5' climb to
3700
and a level flight lasting 40' at this altitude) executed in
the
following
conditions:
Manifold pressure =
840 mm.
Rotation per minute = 2200 R.P.M.
The fuel consumption under these conditions was 230 li-
ters
(available fuel quantity = 400 liters).
.........
- 5 -
In flight conditions called "economical
continus power", the
con-
sumption per hour is about 300 liters,and the specific
consumption
is apprx. 230
gr./HP/h.
B - Results criticism -
The results obtained in
the Center during the first tests
seem to
match well with the German manual, with regards to the level
flight
speeds
and the fuel consumption. Nevertheless, during the level
flight
testing done under
5000 meters
(external temperature = +6°C on ground
and -17°C at 5000 m.) to obtain a correct oil
and water cooling
it was
required
to open the radiators. However, with regards to climbs, the
obtained results are clearly
inferior
to the performance claimed by the
German manual. Yet, four single climbs were done, in order
to find out
the optimal
speed before the climbs done on the 12/23/39.
The table below shows the resulting difference
between the
claimed per-
formance and the obtained performance.
Altitude
Climb Times
obtained during tests
Climb
times
in the German manual
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
1' 16"
2' 31"
3' 50"
5' 03"
6' 20"
8' 01"
10' 02"
1'
1' 54"
3'
3' 48"
4' 54"
6' 18"
(The 5% tolerance claimed in the german booklet
is widely
exceeded.)
The climbing was done at the Center with
the radiators open
up to 4000 m.
then progressively closed until 8300m. It is possible that
the
different
components (1)
used by the German tests could permit climbing
with
closed
radiators.
The climbs will be recommenced again to find
out how to
improve the
obtained
performance results.
The
tests can't permit yet a complete and definiate judgement
on the flying qualities of the Messerchmitt 109. However,
the
first
flights have, in a certain way, given the pilot the
possibility
to
appreciate
the visibility, the efficiency and reaction of the
controls, and alongside, the
combat qualities of
the
tested aircraft.
It must be recalled that the Messerschmidt 109
fuselage first
received
a
Jumo 210
with 670 HP(this version has been studied during a mission
in
Governmental
Spain, with the Report 55/S).
The adaptation of the 1100 HP D.B. 601 was
indeed achieved with a simple
ballast
addition to the extreme rear of the fuselage,and modifiction of the
cowling.
A - VISIBILITY IN
FLIGHT -
a) In Climbs -
Climb angle is very steep, the pilot doesn't
see
anything
in the font.
He sees the ground by the rear.
b) In Level flight -
The visibility is very good to the front and
above, mediocre
to the
sides
and to the rear, zero to the vertical and to the ground in
sector
reaching 60° to the front and 20° to the rear; in
turns, the
visibility is good.
B - STUDY OF THE
CONTROLS -
a) Elevators -
Elevators reaction change with speed variations
are significant.
All movments in the vertical axis require a compensating
manaouvre.
Moreover,the aircraft seems to be longitudinally unstable when at
full
throttle
at low speeds.
As a result of the above :
- the ability to aim very correctly in a dive, provided of the
compensating manaouvre.
- the difficulty to succeed in a shot when nose up.
b) Ailerons -
Very effective, even at low speed - strongly
increasing stiffness at
high
speeds ( IAS > 400 km/h.)
c) Rudder -
The rudder is effective, but the engine torque
is very
badly
compensated.
Some abrupt reactions will unbalance the plane completely.
The pilot is
obliged, when in a climb at IAS = 230km/h (optimal
climbing conditions), to
hold the plane with right foot, and at the rated
altitude, the reaction to the
foot is quite strong to oblige the pilot to hold the
plane with
the ailerons
also.
It is very difficult to turn on the right while in a
climb.
- 7 -
CHAPTER IV
EASE OF OPERATION AND MAINTAINCE
--------------------------------
A - FILLING OF THE
TANKS -
Fuel - by filling under
pressure - fast.
Oil - normal filling, opening at the upper-side
of
the tank.
Water - Through the water-jerrycan opening, doesn't seem to
necessitate
special caution.
B - STARTUP -
Via inertia
starter, manual startup, ignition after winding up. Simple
departure, heating-up the engine on the ground is obtained
in an average of
10
minutes
(on
ground) - Engine gauges are easy to read - judicious arrange
-ment on the
control
panel.
C - MAINTENANCE AND
CHECKS -
Removal of
engine cowling is very fast. Locking of the two-part cowling
panels by
grasshoppers. Sparkplugs are perfecly accessible after
removing the
corresponding cowling part, they are also located on the
exterior side of the
cylinders groups.
The other engine parts are more difficult to
access, in
particular the
magnetos which are not removable as long as the cowl guns
are at their
place.
Checks to the various circulations are easy
except for
some
entangled
pipes within the engine. Those pipes are protected by a
"besano" girdle.
All removable panels and necessary doors are
robust, judiciously
anti-
cipated and simple to remove.
Landing gear : appears to be robust, retraction
system is
simplified to
maximum. Poor protection of the drum brakes, mud can enter
into them in large
quantities.
D - REMOVAL OF THE
ENGINE -
The installation has been designed
to enable rapid removal of the engine.
The pipes connections vith fittings that enable rapid removal.
Controls cables are connected with karabiner, electric cables
brought
together
with pin connectors.
E - HANDLING AND
PARKING -
Aircraft
equipped with necessary devices for
towing, lifting-up
and
ground fixing.
The first flights done at the Center didn't
show any
particular
diffi-
culties in operating the plane.
............
- 8 -
CHAPTER V
G E N E R A L C O N C L U
S I O N
-----------------------------------
In general, the first tests made at the Center
concerning the
Messerschmidt 109 appear to confirm the performances
claimed
by the
Germans. In particular the maximum aircraft speed is about
570 km/h
at around 5000 m.
The installation of the 1100 H.P.
D.B.601 engine transformed the
plane.
The thus obtained aircraft is robust, very well achieved; it
has high
performance; However,the
engine torque is badly compensated.
On defense, when an aicraft is taken by
surprise by a
Messerschmidt,
or a fighter trying to escape after the attack, the above
study lead us to recommend
a
turn to
the right and in a climb as the best
maneuver.
1st Class Engineer
BONTE
Chif engineer VELLAY
Chief of Section Avions 1
Director of Centre d'Essais du
Materiel Avion.
signed :
BONTE
signed : VELLAY
Last updated 23
July 2006.
Work in progress. All rights
reserved. email at : kurfurst@atw.hu
Total Site Page loads :